Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
5.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 18(9): 1482-1489, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33629645

ABSTRACT

Rationale: Critical care clinicians have high burnout rates. Previous studies have explored individual and organizational solutions to address burnout, but existing literature has not considered how professional societies can prevent burnout and promote member well-being. Objectives: The Critical Care Society Collaborative convened a task force to document professional society initiatives to address burnout, explore perspectives on the role of societies to address burnout, and develop recommendations that could guide critical care societies' efforts to promote well-being. Methods: We conducted a multiphase evaluation of 17 major U.S. professional societies whose members regularly work in critical care settings. We asked representatives from each society to document their existing well-being initiatives, and we conducted semistructured interviews to explore perspectives on the role of professional societies to address burnout. The task force members then met to discuss phase one and two findings to develop recommendations that could act as a roadmap to guide future society efforts. Results: All society representatives agreed that professional societies have a responsibility to address burnout, and they described various well-being initiatives that could act as examples for future efforts. We developed a roadmap with the following recommendations: 1) Acknowledge the problem of burnout; 2) Commit to supporting member well-being; 3) Create collaborations to promote well-being; 4) Educate and advocate for change; 5) Foster innovation through research; and 6) Support organizational and individual solutions. Conclusions: Our findings highlight a clear role for professional societies to address burnout and promote members' well-being.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Critical Care , Humans , Professional Role , Societies, Medical
6.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 64(4 Suppl): S53-65, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21458678

ABSTRACT

The American Academy of Dermatology and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, with the support of other sister societies, conducted the Facial Soft-Tissue Fillers: Assessing the State of the Science conference in December of 2009. The American Academy of Dermatology and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons established a panel of leading experts in the field of soft-tissue fillers-from researchers to clinicians-and other stakeholders for the conference to examine and discuss issues of patient safety, efficacy, and effectiveness in relation to the approved and off-label use of soft-tissue fillers, and other factors, including the training and level of experience of individuals administering fillers. This report summarizes the deliberations and key points made by the panel and presenters to the panel, and includes a summary of the panel's near-term and longer term recommendations for next steps to help guide future efforts to address the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of facial soft-tissue fillers. This report represents the panel's assessment of the medical knowledge available on facial soft-tissue fillers at the time of the conference.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatology/methods , Face , Surgery, Plastic/methods , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Collagen/administration & dosage , Collagen/adverse effects , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Dermatology/education , Durapatite/administration & dosage , Durapatite/adverse effects , Evidence-Based Medicine , Forecasting , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Lactic Acid/administration & dosage , Lactic Acid/adverse effects , Polyesters , Polymers/administration & dosage , Polymers/adverse effects , Polymethyl Methacrylate/administration & dosage , Polymethyl Methacrylate/adverse effects , Rejuvenation , Research , Surgery, Plastic/education , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 64(4 Suppl): S66-85, S85.e1-136, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21458679

ABSTRACT

The American Academy of Dermatology and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, with the support of other sister societies, conducted the Facial Soft-Tissue Fillers: Assessing the State of the Science conference in December of 2009. The American Academy of Dermatology and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons established a panel of leading experts in the field of soft-tissue fillers-from researchers to clinicians-and other stakeholders for the conference to examine and discuss issues of patient safety, efficacy, and effectiveness in relation to the approved and off-label use of soft-tissue fillers, and other factors, including the training and level of experience of individuals administering fillers. This report represents the systematic literature review that examines comprehensively the available evidence and gaps in the evidence related to soft-tissue fillers, to inform and support the work of the state-of-the-science conference panel. This evidence-based medicine review will serve as the foundation for future evidence-based medicine reports in this growing field.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatology/methods , Face , Surgery, Plastic/methods , Bibliometrics , Collagen/administration & dosage , Collagen/adverse effects , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Durapatite/administration & dosage , Durapatite/adverse effects , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Lactic Acid/administration & dosage , Lactic Acid/adverse effects , Polyesters , Polymers/administration & dosage , Polymers/adverse effects , Polymethyl Methacrylate/administration & dosage , Polymethyl Methacrylate/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rejuvenation , Research Design , Treatment Outcome
8.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 127(4 Suppl): 22S-S, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21490546

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY: : The American Society of Plastic Surgeons and the American Academy of Dermatology, with the support of other sister societies, conducted the Facial Soft-Tissue Fillers: Assessing the State of the Science conference in December of 2009. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons and the American Academy of Dermatology established a panel of leading experts in the field of soft-tissue fillers-from researchers to clinicians-and other stakeholders for the conference to examine and discuss issues of patient safety, efficacy, and effectiveness in relation to the approved and off-label use of soft-tissue fillers, and other factors, including the training and level of experience of individuals administering fillers. This report represents the systematic literature review that examines comprehensively the available evidence and gaps in the evidence related to soft-tissue fillers, to inform and support the work of the state-of-the-science conference panel. This evidence-based medicine review will serve as the foundation for future evidence-based medicine reports in this growing field.


Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Face , Cosmetic Techniques , Dermatology , Face/surgery , Humans , Science
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...